Senti
For Quant Funds, Family Offices & Prop Trading Teams
Your servers. Our operations.
A managed automation layer on your own infrastructure. You keep capital, strategy IP, broker relationships, and risk. Senti handles deployment, monitoring, and escalation.
These figures are infrastructure activity and availability signals from Senti's live beta, not investment-performance or return claims. Senti provides trading automation infrastructure; it does not promise returns or evaluate whether a strategy will be profitable.
Your edge belongs in research, not infrastructure maintenance
A strategy can be sound while the operation around it remains fragile. Separate terminals, aging VPS instances, inconsistent deployment steps, and unclear incident ownership turn a trading desk into an infrastructure team. That cost compounds as you add accounts.
- Researchers lose time to terminal and server maintenance.
- Operational knowledge sits with individuals instead of a repeatable process.
- Every new account creates another surface to monitor and support.
- Platform incidents interrupt strategy work and blur accountability.
- Compliance and security requirements become harder to meet with fragmented environments.
What changes with Senti
Senti creates a clear operating boundary. Your team owns the trading decisions. Our team owns the agreed infrastructure service.
One view, account-specific execution
Senti replaces a collection of separately maintained terminals and VPS instances with a managed operating scope built around the desk.
- Cross-broker visibility: review the supported account and execution state across the agreed broker scope instead of opening each terminal separately.
- Per-account execution isolation: each Trade Account runs in its own execution context, so one account's runtime state is not shared with another.
- Operating telemetry: bring positions, P&L, drawdown, execution status, and incident context into the agreed monitoring and reporting surface.
- Authorized control: define who can pause or stop a deployment and how an infrastructure issue escalates to Senti engineering.
- Managed around the clock: Senti operates the contracted environment continuously; your researchers stop maintaining MT5 and VPS environments one by one.
The exact telemetry, control surface, retention, and response commitments are confirmed for the on-premise deployment rather than inferred from the self-serve product.
Built for teams that need control without operational drag
Senti Quant is designed for teams whose strategy and operating model should stay theirs, but whose infrastructure no longer needs to be another internal product.
- Quant funds that need a stable operating layer around their own systematic strategies.
- Prop desks coordinating execution across multiple accounts or traders.
- Family offices that want trading infrastructure inside their own technology boundary.
- Emerging managers preparing for more rigorous operational and technical due diligence.
On-premise engagements are typically qualified for organizations operating $500k+ in trading capital, where the need for a dedicated environment can justify a managed deployment. This is a fit guideline, not a promise of acceptance. The final fit depends on the environment, broker scope, operating requirements, and support expectations confirmed during discovery.
One boundary. Clear ownership.
Senti does not manage your fund, make trading decisions, or take custody of capital. The boundary is explicit, and it is the same on every engagement.
Non-custodial by design
Capital does not enter Senti's custody
Funds stay in your broker accounts.
- Capital remains in your broker accounts. Your organization owns allocation, risk, and trading decisions.
- Senti cannot withdraw or transfer funds.
- Senti does not need your strategy source code by default. The strategy artifact and access boundary are agreed during technical discovery, and your strategy IP remains yours.
- Senti provides the infrastructure service. It does not manage your fund or make trading decisions.
Senti is trading automation infrastructure. It is not a broker, fund manager, copy-trading marketplace, signal seller, or promise of returns.
Why on-premise
The platform is deployed inside the infrastructure boundary agreed with your team. That can be your servers, network, or controlled cloud environment. This model is suited to teams that value:
- Strategy and data sovereignty: keep the operating environment within your control perimeter.
- Dedicated infrastructure: align resources with the workload agreed for your desk.
- Operational clarity: define access, maintenance windows, incident ownership, and escalation before production.
- Environment-specific requirements: scope deployment around real security, governance, and jurisdictional needs, without claiming that software alone provides regulatory compliance.
$2,000 per month. No setup fee.
The standard service fee covers the agreed on-premise deployment, ongoing platform maintenance, uptime SLA, and engineering support.
- You keep 100% of your broker rebate. Senti does not intermediate your broker relationship or take a share of that revenue.
- There is no separate setup fee for the standard Quant service.
- Exact environment, resource, support, and SLA terms are confirmed during discovery and contract review.
The 99.9% live-beta uptime figure above is measured operational history, not the contractual SLA for your deployment. Your uptime, incident-response, and support commitments are defined in the service agreement for the confirmed environment.
Choose around the control boundary your team needs
Different platform categories serve different operating models. Choose around the control boundary your team actually needs.
Strong fit when you run team-owned strategies and want a managed on-premise automation environment.
Operating trade-off: your team retains strategy, capital, broker, and risk ownership while Senti manages the contracted platform scope.
Strong fit when strategy discovery, social trading, or access to an existing copy network is central to the offer.
Operating trade-off: the model follows the network's copy-trading product rather than a private, team-owned on-premise environment.
Strong fit when a mature customer-facing trader interface and broker-led workflow are the priority.
Operating trade-off: additional automation operations and team-specific infrastructure remain separate scope.
Strong fit when infrastructure itself is strategic IP and you can maintain a permanent platform team.
Operating trade-off: you keep maximum control and also own deployment, monitoring, maintenance, and incident response.
A controlled path to production
Map accounts, brokers, strategy artifacts, infrastructure, access controls, and support expectations.
Agree what stays with your team, what Senti manages, and how incidents move between both sides.
Confirm environment requirements, security constraints, maintenance windows, and acceptance criteria.
Start with a limited deployment and verify the operating process before expanding.
Establish the production scope, SLA, escalation path, and review cadence.
The delivery timeline is confirmed after technical discovery, because it depends on the environment and integration scope.
Frequently asked questions
Does Senti need our strategy source code? +
Does Senti hold or manage our capital? +
Does Senti guarantee strategy performance? +
What is included in the $2,000 monthly fee? +
Is there a setup fee? +
Does Senti take part of our broker rebate? +
Is $500k a hard capital requirement? +
How quickly can we deploy? +
Put infrastructure on a contract.
Bring your environment, account scope, and operating requirements. We will confirm the fit and define the smallest responsible path to production.